Ietls writing - Day 10

#1
Screenshot%202023-08-30%20at%2021.03.14.png

The chart shows the number of international visitors of five areas from 1990 to 2005.

Overall, the number of international visitors had the tendency to increase over the period. Europe was often the most visited area while Africa and Middle East took the least proportion of total tourists share.

In 1990, Europe attracted over 280 million visitors from all over the globe. The area was among the best choices of people due to its old architectural buildings, as well as well-preserved natural landscape. America was the second popular area with 80.5 million tourists and followed by Asia and the pacific with about 60.2 million. Africa and Middle East shared the least amount of international visitors, with only 18.2 and 9.8 million respectively.

In the next 15 years, while Europe still maintained its position, Asia and the pacific quickly took over the second most attractive area and reached 135.8 million tourists in 2005. America, in the other hand, did not show any improvement in tourist attractions. This probably due to the fact that Asia and the pacific had the advantage over America as most of the countries in this area were still considered as third world countries, so the tourism cost was much more affordable for global travellers. Additionally, in America, especially the US and Canada, most of its budget was saved for researching and developing advanced technology, so financial spending for tourism attraction was likely to be cut off.
Mày học theo sách nào, cho tao tham khảo zới
 
The chart (this is a table, not a chart) shows the number of international visitors of five areas from 1990 to 2005.


Overall, the number of international visitors had the tendency to increase over the period. Europe was often (I am not sure about the often here) the most visited area while Africa and Middle East took the least proportion of total tourists share.

(Very good overall, you have described the overall trend and made 02 comparisons. Good in complex sentence)

In 1990, Europe attracted over 280 million visitors from all over the globe. The area was among the best choices of people due to its old architectural buildings, as well as well-preserved natural landscape (Do not try to be a smart ass here, this information is irrelevant to the given table). America was the second popular area with 80.5 million tourists and followed by Asia and the pacific with about 60.2 million. Africa and Middle East shared the least amount of international visitors, with only 18.2 and 9.8 million respectively. (To improve this paragrapth, you should add one or two comparitions here, for example: The international tourists of the American was higher than that of Asia and the Pacific, 80.5 million compared to 60.2 million respectively.


In the next 15 years, while Europe still maintained its position, Asia and the Pacific quickly took over the second most attractive area and reached 135.8 million tourists in 2005. America, in the other hand, did not show any improvement in tourist attractions (good notice). This probably due to the fact that Asia and the pacific had the advantage over America as most of the countries in this area were still considered as third world countries, so the tourism cost was much more affordable for global travellers. (Do not make assumtions, the task does not ask you about it !!!!) Additionally, in America, especially the US and Canada, most of its budget was saved for researching and developing advanced technology, so financial spending for tourism attraction was likely
to be cut off. (Same here!!!). Can add the data of Africa which is the number of tourists increased significantly, nearly doubled in 2005 compared to 1995

Tao vẫn chưa phải chuyên gia nhưng tao đoán mày đang ở band 5.5-6.0. Bài này mày có overall tốt nên có thể lấy được band 6.0. Trong 2 đoạn 1 và hai mày cần thêm các yếu tố so sánh và sử dụng thêm câu phức để tăng điểm. Mày thêm quá nhiều yếu tố thừa thãi mà task nó không hỏi trong cả hai đoạn văn. Thêm vào thế tao đảm bảo mày bị giáng xuống 5.0 hoặc 5.5 vì ảnh hưởng đến task archivement
Tip của tao là mày tìm criteria của IELTS task 1 mà đọc kỹ vào, câu phức và các cấu trúc so sánh cực kỳ quan trọng để lấy band 6.5
Mong các cao nhân khác góp ý thêm
Thằng thớt tự sáng tác fact thêm vào tao thấy có vẻ sai sai phải ko. Giám khảo đọc chắc sẽ ko đánh giá cao.
 
I'm on the same path as you, but there's a slight difference. I aim to become proficient in four skills. I'm struggling with my listening and speaking abilities. Therefore, phrasal verbs are my priority. You've been doing an amazing job. Keep up the great work.
Thanks man! Really appreicate your words.

Speaking and listening skills are much harder to get. Even if you don't spend regularly, gradually you will lose it. Harder way, stronger man!
 
What's up Xammer!

I have stopped at the day 27 in my Nofap process. What I realize is that Nofap is great for those who are addicted to porn, not for me.

So, looking back at my recent goal, I decide to create this topic to track my record on learning Ielts writing.

One of the reasons I want to make my progress public here is to encourage xammers to wake your asses and study the language with me. Furthermore, getting commented from others makes me feel quite connected.

Let's get fucking started.

P/S: I gradually update my writing later on.
your asses là con người ngu độn của bạn à
 
#2 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.

The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organisations from 2008 to 2011.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

You should write at least 150 words.


Screenshot%202023-08-30%20at%2020.57.43.png


The graph demonstrates the allocation of financial support from different organizations given to developing nations throughout the period of 2008 to 2011.

Overall, while organization 2 had the tendency to donate more money to developing countries, the remaining organizations either maintained their contributions or gradually decreased them.

In 2008, organization 3 led in financial support to third world countries, providing about 1.5 billion dollars. Organization 2 and 5 followed as the second-highest contributors, with approximately 1.25 billion dollars each. In contrast, the other organizations were observed far left behind, with only about 0.75 billion dollars donated.

In 2009, while organization 1, 2 and 3 supported more money, organization 4 and 5 had cut their financial aid by nearly 50%. Also this year, organization 3 still maintained to be the top donor with an allocation of nearly 1.75 billion dollars.

However, by the end of 2010, organization 2 experienced a substantial increase in the amount of donations, surpassing all others to become the largest contributor. It continued to escalate the total amount of money, reaching over than 2.5 billion dollars by the end of 2011.

@TatHuan
 
Sửa lần cuối:
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.

The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organisations from 2008 to 2011.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

You should write at least 150 words.


Screenshot%202023-08-30%20at%2020.57.43.png


The graph demonstrates the allocation of financial support from different organizations given to developing nations throughout the period of 2008 to 2011.

Overall, while organization 2 had the tendency to donate more money to developing countries, the remaining organizations either maintained their contributions or gradually decreased them.

In 2008, organization 3 led in financial support to third world countries, providing about 1.5 billion dollars. Organization 2 and 5 followed as the second-highest contributors, with approximately 1.25 billion dollars each. In contrast, the other organizations were observed far left behind, with only about 0.75 billion dollars donated.

In 2009, while organization 1, 2 and 3 supported more money, organization 4 and 5 had cut their financial aid by nearly 50%. Also this year, organization 3 still maintained to be the top donor with an allocation of nearly 1.75 billion dollars.

However, by the end of 2010, organization 2 experienced a substantial increase in the amount of donations, surpassing all others to become the largest contributor. It continued to escalate the total amount of money, reaching over than 2.5 billion dollars by the end of 2011.

@TatHuan
Tao mấy nay bận code tí, rảnh tao quay lại luyện tập ngay

Tao ủng hộ và tán dương sự chăm chỉ của m, keep going, try your best!
 
Sửa lần cuối:
Top